Serge -- Thanks for the short, concise explanations. I have several ideas/suggestions but don't have time to organize & write them now. Let me briefly describe the "highest level" and maybe you will reply, "Yes we are working on that."
... or maybe, "It already does that. From the ___ menu choose ____ then ...." 
I think it would be great if CodeIt.Right would do with "Metrics" similar to what it does with code analysis. If a metric is over a threshold specified in the selected "Metrics Rules" the CodeIt.Right GUI indicates this. Like code analysis, the user is just a click away from helpful information. Exclusions can be applied at the file level because sometimes the only reasonable way to do something, like a message pump, is with a huge switch. I don't know enough about Depth of Inheritance to know if this makes sense, but ISTM that DI(JustMyCode) could be nice.
It would be nice if there were configurable rules for "Is this chunk of code documented well enough?" These are some of the factors:
- Blank lines
- Code lines
- Comments appended to lines of code (I like these, they save screen space)
- Comment lines that appear to be real comments
- Comments that appear to be commented-out code
- The "block of code" the comment(s) apply to
Here are some sample rules:
- Fail if 5% or more "commented-out code" comments
- Fail a file that doesn't have "real comments" associated with each "major block of code". I.e., Methods, If statements with more than ____ lines, loops with more than ____ lines, etc.
- Fail if < 10% comments
- Fail if no header
-- Mark